![]() ![]() ![]() Business journalist Charles Fishman’s purpose is to synthesize all the critiques into one overarching analysis of “the Wal-Mart effect,” that is, how the company “gets those low prices, and what impact the low prices have far beyond Wal-Mart’s shelves and beyond our own wallets: the cost of low prices to the companies that supply Wal-Mart, and to the people who work for those companies.” ![]() Like the blind men who tried to assay the elephant in the fable, many have touched on different aspects of the mega-retailer. And in the 230 years since Smith penned those famous words, society has learned to question his narrow vision of “the sole purpose of all production.”Īs books like this demonstrate, Wal-Mart is the elephant in the room that no one is ignoring. His dream was a variant of Adam Smith’s assertion in The Wealth of Nations: “The sole purpose of all production is to provide the best possible goods to the consumer at the lowest possible price.” The variation stems from the qualifier “best possible”: Walton’s obsessive quest never extended to quality. Sam Walton had a dream: find out what people want and sell it to them for less. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |